特约评论员 管姚：你的观察很敏锐。我留意到一个细节，甚至今天还有自媒体做起了翻译版本评点，对比诸如“隔岸观火”、“拱火浇油”及“趁机牟利”的金句提法，哪种翻译更贴切，更精准。博主的结论是，对照英国BBC同题报道，今天《华盛顿邮报》的转译版本完胜：China would neither watch the fire from afar，nor add fuel to the flames，let alone exploit the situation for profit。在我看来，美西方媒体的这种关注报道热度，正是大国分量大国影响力的具体折射。 

zai“jibenshangmeiyoushiyan、congshichunjichulilunyanjiu”delilunwulisuo，zhuangciguanchadao，keyanrenyuanshouruzhongyoujin40%xuyaocongkeyanxiangmuzhongzhichu，zhejiudaozhiruguobuzhengquxiangmujiumeibanfabaozhangzijideshourushuiping，“shenzhizaibeijingdezufangyalidouhenda”。在(zai)“(“)基(ji)本(ben)上(shang)没(mei)有(you)实(shi)验(yan)、(、)从(cong)事(shi)纯(chun)基(ji)础(chu)理(li)论(lun)研(yan)究(jiu)”(”)的(de)理(li)论(lun)物(wu)理(li)所(suo)，(，)庄(zhuang)辞(ci)观(guan)察(cha)到(dao)，(，)科(ke)研(yan)人(ren)员(yuan)收(shou)入(ru)中(zhong)有(you)近(jin)4(4)0%(%)需(xu)要(yao)从(cong)科(ke)研(yan)项(xiang)目(mu)中(zhong)支(zhi)出(chu)，(，)这(zhe)就(jiu)导(dao)致(zhi)如(ru)果(guo)不(bu)争(zheng)取(qu)项(xiang)目(mu)就(jiu)没(mei)办(ban)法(fa)保(bao)障(zhang)自(zi)己(ji)的(de)收(shou)入(ru)水(shui)平(ping)，(，)“(“)甚(shen)至(zhi)在(zai)北(bei)京(jing)的(de)租(zu)房(fang)压(ya)力(li)都(dou)很(hen)大(da)”(”)。(。)