特约评论员 管姚：你的观察很敏锐。我留意到一个细节，甚至今天还有自媒体做起了翻译版本评点，对比诸如“隔岸观火”、“拱火浇油”及“趁机牟利”的金句提法，哪种翻译更贴切，更精准。博主的结论是，对照英国BBC同题报道，今天《华盛顿邮报》的转译版本完胜：China would neither watch the fire from afar，nor add fuel to the flames，let alone exploit the situation for profit。在我看来，美西方媒体的这种关注报道热度，正是大国分量大国影响力的具体折射。 

anzhaoguojiashuilibuguanwangdejieshi：“liyongdifanghehedaoxiehong，yunyongshuikulanxuhongshui，ruguorengbunenggoukongzhihongshui，zaishishiqiyongxuzhihongqu，yifenxuchaoehongshui，xuejianhongfeng，zuidachengdudijianqinghongshuizaihaizongtisunshi。”按(an)照(zhao)国(guo)家(jia)水(shui)利(li)部(bu)官(guan)网(wang)的(de)解(jie)释(shi)：(：)“(“)利(li)用(yong)堤(di)防(fang)和(he)河(he)道(dao)泄(xie)洪(hong)，(，)运(yun)用(yong)水(shui)库(ku)拦(lan)蓄(xu)洪(hong)水(shui)，(，)如(ru)果(guo)仍(reng)不(bu)能(neng)够(gou)控(kong)制(zhi)洪(hong)水(shui)，(，)再(zai)适(shi)时(shi)启(qi)用(yong)蓄(xu)滞(zhi)洪(hong)区(qu)，(，)以(yi)分(fen)蓄(xu)超(chao)额(e)洪(hong)水(shui)，(，)削(xue)减(jian)洪(hong)峰(feng)，(，)最(zui)大(da)程(cheng)度(du)地(di)减(jian)轻(qing)洪(hong)水(shui)灾(zai)害(hai)总(zong)体(ti)损(sun)失(shi)。(。)”(”)